For Corporate Attorneys ·
What you'll accomplish
Your positions on indemnity, liability caps, governing law and data terms probably live in three places: a Word document nobody has updated since spring, old emails, and your head. You will put the written version in a Claude Project so every first-pass review starts from the same source. Claude cites the playbook row behind each position. When the playbook has nothing to say, it tells you so instead of improvising. You still do the review. The assistant gives you a consistent first draft of the issues list for the business owner.
What you'll need
A caution before you upload. Your playbook describes how your company negotiates, and the contracts you paste in carry the counterparty's terms, which an NDA may restrict you from sharing with a service provider. Read the NDA's own terms. Then check the data settings on your Claude plan: whether chats are used for training, how long they are kept, and who in your company can see them. A free consumer plan may use chats to train models unless a setting is off. Whether using an AI tool affects privilege is unsettled, so follow your company's policy and your state bar's guidance. When you paste a clause, replace party names with roles ("Customer" and "Vendor"), drop deal values, and leave out privileged strategy notes unless your company has cleared the tool for them.
Claude can only cite what it can read. A playbook with clear row labels gives you citations you can check in seconds.
What you should see: One to three clean documents with labelled rows and no deal-specific content. Troubleshooting: If your playbook is a long narrative, split it by topic and add a heading to each section. Claude cites headings far more reliably than paragraphs.
What you should see: An empty project page with a chat box in the centre and a knowledge area on the right side. Troubleshooting: Claude does not see the project name or description (per Anthropic's help center). Anything Claude needs to know goes into the instructions in Step 4.
What you should see: Each file listed in the knowledge area. Troubleshooting: Project files are limited by size and Claude's context window, and text is extracted from them. Tables that are really images will not come through. Paste such tables into a text or Word file first.
You are a first-pass contract review assistant for the legal department of [Company]. The lawyer using you is responsible for all final judgments.
Use only the playbook, templates and approval matrix in project knowledge. Do not use general knowledge to fill a gap.
When the lawyer pastes a clause or a contract section, return a table with these columns:
1. Clause (a short label)
2. Playbook row (the exact heading or row label from the playbook file)
3. Where the pasted text stands (meets preferred position, within an approved fallback, outside the playbook)
4. Approval needed (taken from the approval matrix, or "not stated")
5. Suggested response for the business owner, in plain language
If the playbook does not cover a clause, write "The playbook is silent on this" in the Playbook row column and stop. Do not guess a position. List these gaps again at the end under "Playbook gaps".
Quote playbook wording only when it appears in the file. Never cite a case, statute or regulation. Where the pasted text conflicts with two playbook rows, say so and name both.
Finish with a short issues list for the business owner: the three to five points that most need a decision, in order.
What you should see: The instructions saved and shown in the project. Troubleshooting: If the table comes back unformatted, add "Always use a table" to the instructions and test again.
What you should see: A cited row for the first test and an honest gap for the second. Troubleshooting: If Claude fills the gap with its own view, tighten the instruction: "If you cannot point to a heading in the project files, you may not state a position."
Compare to approval matrix:
List every clause in the text below that would need approval under the matrix in this project. For each, name who approves and why. If the matrix does not cover it, say so.
Find the gaps:
Read the sections below. Do not review them. Only list the topics they cover that the playbook has no row for.
Draft the response email:
Using the table above, draft a short email to the business owner. Lead with the one decision I need from them. Keep it under 150 words and avoid legal jargon.
Check a proposed fallback:
The counterparty proposes the wording below. Does it fall inside an approved fallback in the playbook? Quote the playbook row and compare the two side by side.